اقوام متحدہ کے عالمی انسانی حقوق کےمنشور کا میثاقِ مدینہ کے ساتھ تقابلی جائزہ (حصہ اول

( A Comparative Study of the United Nations, Universal Declaration of Human Right and the Charter of Madinah (Part One)

Abstract

The comparison between the UN Charter, particularly the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR), and the Constitution of Medina reveals significant similarities in their foundational principles, such as justice, peace, and protection of human rights. However, while the UN framework emphasizes universal human rights often shaped by modern liberal values, the Constitution of Medina demonstrates a pluralistic yet faith-conscious model that integrates religious diversity within a cohesive legal and social framework. The Constitution of Medina's context-specific and tribe-inclusive approach offers a timeless model for co-existence, while the UDHR, despite its strengths, includes aspects that may not align with all religious or ethical systems. Nonetheless, the essence of many UDHR rights aligns with Islamic teachings, even if not explicitly stated in the Constitution of Medina